Jordan StevensonFor Port Hope MayorPosition change
The campaign consolidated and reordered the public framework from 18 rules to 12: Rules 1–6 now state how the campaign will operate, and Rules 7–12 state how Jordan would govern. Substantive commitments were merged into the new framework rather than quietly discarded. Rule 6 now explicitly guarantees that published position changes remain visible, Rule 9 makes public decision-making the default, and Rule 11 distinguishes organized participation from representative public opinion.
Public platform history is current.
The campaign consolidated and reordered the public framework from 18 rules to 12: Rules 1–6 now state how the campaign will operate, and Rules 7–12 state how Jordan would govern. Substantive commitments were merged into the new framework rather than quietly discarded. Rule 6 now explicitly guarantees that published position changes remain visible, Rule 9 makes public decision-making the default, and Rule 11 distinguishes organized participation from representative public opinion.
The previous framework mixed campaign conduct into the governing section, buried immediately enforceable campaign standards after prospective governing standards, and split privacy, finance, corrections and reporting commitments across redundant rules. Consolidating and reordering the framework improves category accuracy, salience and auditability.
Rule 01
Town Hall exists to serve the people of Port Hope. I will make decisions, explain them, own the result and change course when the facts show that a better answer is needed.
The campaign's published decision standard is:
The published standard is to seek relevant expertise, test ideas against evidence, cost and public impact, make a decision and own it.
Rule 02
Port Hope should test new methods in ways that protect taxpayers and produce evidence residents can inspect.
Small pilots should begin with clear outcomes, fixed limits, independent evaluation and published results. A successful pilot should still proceed through lawful procurement before any major rollout.
Rule 03
Residents should not need to know whether the Town, County, Province, police, public health, a utility or another body controls an issue before asking for help.
Town Hall will give residents a clear explanation, a useful next step and visible follow-through. That includes explaining responsibility, helping the resident navigate the system, advocating where another body controls the solution, escalating unresolved failures, reporting when progress is blocked and carrying the file until there is a clear answer.
Rule 04
Major decisions should arrive with enough information for a resident to understand the choice before Council votes.
Published decision information should include:
Rule 05
Listening should reach beyond whoever can attend the loudest meeting.
Published participation methods include open consultations and representative surveys, randomly selected resident panels where useful, participatory budgeting for defined discretionary funds, Ward 1 and Ward 2 engagement, expert and lived-experience input, and referendums only for exceptional, major and potentially irreversible decisions where legally appropriate.
Council will make, explain and own the final decision.
Rule 06
After a campaign poll closes, the campaign will publish what it heard, where people disagreed and what changed as a result.
Campaign polls are presented as informal opinion polls, not scientific surveys, verified resident votes, official municipal consultation or official election votes.
Rule 07
Formal mayoral powers will be used transparently and proportionately to advance a clear municipal purpose.
Rule 08
Every major decision should explain urban and rural impacts, service and capital differences, emergency access, agriculture, roads, downtown pressures, who benefits and who pays.
Equal service can require different delivery based on local needs.
Rule 09
Technology should make Town Hall easier to deal with.
It should reduce repetitive work, improve follow-up, make information easier to find and help residents understand the status and evidence behind a decision.
Technology will support human judgement while improving service, protecting privacy and producing results residents can check.
Rule 10
Answering an opinion poll does not subscribe anyone to campaign email, create a volunteer record, add a lawn-sign request, or attach the poll choice to a campaign contact form.
A fuller concern can be sent through a separate form, but the campaign does not connect that message to the person's poll choice.
Rule 11
Youth Idea Lab submissions remain private unless the campaign later contacts the submitter and receives permission to publish the idea.
The form does not request a name, school, address, phone number, birthdate, or exact age. An email is optional, stored separately from the idea, and used only to reply.
Poll choices, game activity, and challenge choices are not used to build supporter profiles or for political microtargeting.
Rule 12
Contact, volunteer, update, concern, media, conversation, and lawn-sign records are kept while they are needed to respond and organize campaign activity, then reviewed for deletion when they are no longer needed.
Some records may be retained longer when required for legal, security, dispute, or election compliance purposes.
Raw poll vote and duplicate-prevention identifiers are removed through campaign data maintenance after a poll has been closed for at least 180 days. Aggregate counts and public result summaries may be kept after those identifiers are removed.
Rule 13
The campaign will not accept more than $500 from any individual.
The limit applies consistently to eligible monetary and in-kind contributions. Amounts that cannot be accepted will be returned or refunded and included in approved public reporting.
Public evidence: Contribution distribution, returned or refunded contributions, and approved finance publications.
Rule 14
Material factual claims will be backed by identifiable public evidence.
The campaign will not publish material factual claims about another candidate, public institution, municipal decision or policy proposal unless those claims are supported by identifiable public evidence. Estimates, interpretations, inferences and political opinions will be clearly identified as such. If the campaign publishes something materially wrong, the correction and original wording will remain publicly accessible.
Public evidence: Source links, public corrections, and the platform-change history.
Rule 15
A donation will not purchase better access, a faster response, political preference or favourable treatment.
That standard covers meetings and campaign responses as well as advocacy involving grants, contracts, procurement, planning, permitting, appointments, municipal services and advance access to decisions. Donors retain the same ordinary access as every other resident—no more and no less.
Public evidence: The public corrections and breach record, with any failure and corrective action disclosed.
Rule 16
Approved campaign-finance information will be published during the campaign.
Residents should not have to wait for the legally required post-election filing to see how the campaign is funded and where campaign money goes.
Public evidence: Finances at a glance, contribution distribution, campaign spending, other disclosures and the official filing.
Rule 17
Campaign communications will be attributable, factual and accountable.
The campaign will not use fake community accounts, anonymous attack pages, concealed proxies or intermediaries to spread personal attacks, and it will not target candidates’ families or irrelevant private lives. That does not prevent forceful, factual criticism of public records, statements, conduct, competence or policy positions.
Approved disclosures will identify material consultants, contractors, agencies, advisers, professional service providers and vendors receiving campaign funds.
Public evidence: Material paid-relationship disclosures, campaign spending, corrections and breach disclosures.
Rule 18
Material corrections and changes will remain visible instead of quietly disappearing.
The public record will explain what changed, why it changed, the evidence or feedback that informed it, and what corrective action followed when a commitment was not met.
If the campaign fails to meet one of these commitments, the failure will be recorded publicly with an explanation and corrective action.
Public evidence: Corrections, platform-change history, disclosed failures and corrective action.
Rule 01
Material factual claims will be backed by identifiable public evidence.
Opinions, estimates, interpretations and inferences will be identified as such. If the campaign publishes something materially wrong, the correction and original wording will remain publicly accessible.
Public evidence: Source links, public corrections and the platform change log.
Rule 02
The campaign will cap individual contributions at $500 and publish campaign-finance information during the campaign.
Public evidence: Contribution distribution, returned or refunded contributions, campaign spending, paid-relationship disclosures and the official filing.
Rule 03
A donation will not purchase better access, a faster response, political preference, favourable treatment or advance access to decisions.
The standard covers campaign responses and advocacy involving grants, contracts, procurement, planning, permitting, appointments and municipal services. Donors retain the same ordinary access as every other resident, no more and no less.
Public evidence: Public corrections, breach disclosures and corrective action.
Rule 04
Campaign communications will be attributable, factual and accountable.
The campaign will not use fake community accounts, anonymous attack pages, concealed proxies or intermediaries to spread personal attacks, and it will not target candidates’ families or irrelevant private lives. Forceful, factual criticism of public records, statements, conduct, competence and policy remains fair game.
Public evidence: Public campaign communications, corrections and breach disclosures.
Rule 05
Taking part in the campaign will not be used to quietly build political profiles.
Public evidence: Published privacy practices, corrections and disclosed failures.
Rule 06
If the campaign changes a published position, the previous position, the reason for the change and the new position will remain publicly visible.
Public evidence: Poll report-backs, corrections, the platform change log, disclosed failures and corrective action.
Rule 07
Town Hall exists to serve the people of Port Hope. I will make decisions, explain them, own the result and change course when the facts show that a better answer is needed.
Rule 08
Residents should not need to know whether the Town, County, Province, police, public health, a utility or another body controls an issue before asking Town Hall for help.
Rule 09
Major municipal decisions should be debated and decided in public. Closed sessions should be used only where the law permits and a compelling public-interest reason makes confidentiality necessary.
Rule 10
Port Hope should test new methods in ways that protect taxpayers and produce evidence residents can inspect.
Small pilots should begin with clear outcomes, fixed limits, independent evaluation and published results. A successful pilot should still proceed through lawful procurement before a major rollout.
Rule 11
Organized groups will be heard, but no group will be treated as representative of the whole community simply because it is louder, more organized or more present at meetings.
Rule 12
Port Hope is one municipality, but equal treatment does not always require identical delivery.
Major decisions will account for the different needs of Ward 1 and Ward 2, including roads, agriculture, emergency access, servicing, infrastructure, downtown pressures, who benefits and who pays.
The $500 contribution cap, sourced-facts standard, public corrections, no-donor-access rule, financial reporting, accountable campaign conduct, privacy protections, public report-backs, decision ownership, No Wrong Door, open evidence, controlled pilots and urban-rural fairness remain in force. Campaign polls and consultations remain inputs rather than binding or scientific votes; a credible pattern of objection may change the campaign's course, but the previous position and explanation remain public. Organized groups remain heard without being presumed representative; majority views do not override legal rights, evidence or municipal duties, and Council still makes, explains and owns the final decision.
No supporting explanation was available. The repository evidence remains visible below.
The source record identifies the primary canonical surfaces. This list also includes the voter-facing pages materially updated as part of the website implementation.