Jordan StevensonFor Port Hope Mayor
Join the Campaign
Menu

Platform pillar 03

Wesleyville on Port Hope's Terms

Take the opportunity without a blank cheque

Wesleyville could be a generational opportunity. Support does not mean surrendering municipal judgement. Nuclear safety belongs to federal regulators and the operator. Port Hope's job is to protect local finances, plan infrastructure and emergency readiness, and secure durable community value.

The short version

At a glance

What changes first

  1. Establish municipal cost, capacity and emergency-readiness baselines before major commitments are made.
  2. Negotiate a binding and public host-community and infrastructure agreement.
  3. Create transparent workforce, supplier and community-benefit reporting.

Who pays

OPG, the Province and the project structure should make fair upfront and ongoing contributions toward reasonably attributable project-driven municipal costs. Existing taxpayers should not be left carrying those costs without protection.

What success looks like

  • Project-driven municipal costs are fairly funded.
  • Infrastructure and emergency-readiness milestones are completed before capacity is exceeded.
  • Local workers and suppliers can see and access real opportunities.
  • Agreements, audits, risks and unresolved conditions are publicly reported.

What Jordan supports

  • New nuclear generation at Wesleyville subject to regulatory approval and strong local terms
  • A host-community and infrastructure agreement requiring fair contributions toward reasonably attributable project-driven municipal costs
  • Local workforce pathways, supplier access and transparent community-benefit commitments
  • Independent municipal capacity to scrutinize agreements and project impacts

What Jordan will not support

  • Using hoped-for future tax revenue to excuse immediate municipal exposure
  • Secret side agreements or benefits without measurable obligations
  • Pretending Port Hope can regulate reactor safety
  • Growth that overwhelms housing, roads, emergency services or community life

Concrete commitments

What changes

  • Publish municipal cost and capacity baselines before major commitments
  • Seek advance funding for roads, water, wastewater, stormwater, fire, emergency planning, recreation and administrative capacity driven by the project
  • Require lifecycle funding, escalation clauses, audit rights, public reporting and dispute mechanisms
  • Create local training and procurement pathways without making unlawful guarantees
  • Plan housing and growth so the whole municipality benefits, including Ward 2

How it works

The mechanisms behind the position

Host Community and Infrastructure Agreement

Before unconditional municipal support, Port Hope should seek a binding agreement with milestone-based upfront infrastructure contributions and ongoing host-community payments.

  • Roads, traffic, water, wastewater and stormwater
  • Fire, emergency planning, equipment and exercises
  • Municipal staffing, planning, technical and legal review
  • Environmental monitoring, public consultation and long-term operations
  • Escalation clauses, audit rights, public reporting and dispute resolution

Safety, preparedness and oversight

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulates nuclear safety. Port Hope should participate fully in regulatory processes, retain independent advisers of its choosing at project cost and maintain a permanent emergency role.

  • Regular emergency exercises
  • Plain-language monitoring and regulatory reporting
  • Corrective-action tracking and a community liaison process
  • Protection for genuinely sensitive security information

Local workforce and suppliers

Negotiate a workforce plan without promising unlawful residency quotas or guaranteed jobs.

  • Occupation forecasts and recruitment plans
  • Apprenticeships, pre-apprenticeships and paid co-ops or placements
  • Education, labour and training partnerships
  • Supplier development and permitted local targets
  • Public hiring, training and procurement reporting

Responsibility

Who controls what

Jurisdiction sets the route to action. It does not end the conversation.

Port Hope controls

  • Municipal services, local infrastructure, land-use decisions within municipal authority
  • Local emergency readiness and municipal agreements
  • Public reporting on local costs, benefits and unresolved conditions

Cooperation required

  • Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regulation
  • Ontario Power Generation and provincial energy decisions
  • Federal, provincial, County, education, labour and industry partners

Measure progress

Residents should be able to check the result

  • Reasonably attributable municipal project costs fairly funded
  • Agreement obligations completed on time
  • Local workers trained and local suppliers participating
  • Housing, traffic, infrastructure and emergency-readiness milestones
  • Public reports, audits, unresolved risks and regulatory milestones

Keep reading

The same governing standards apply across the platform

Authority must be assigned clearly. Responsibility for the resident's experience must not disappear between institutions.

No wrong door. Show the work. Fair rules and meaningful recourse. One Port Hope. Change course when the facts change.

How I'll GovernStraight Answers

Help improve the platform

Agree, disagree or see something missing?

This platform should improve through serious public feedback. Tell Jordan what is right, what is wrong and what needs more work.

Share your feedbackGet campaign updatesVolunteer

All six pillars